Unhealthy Health Service

Posted on 12 min read 162 views

Engineering the Truth, Trashing the Science.

We have been faced with an unprecedented response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Never before have we been faced with such a media blitz on one hand and a massive attack on anyone who would dare to challenge the so-called ‘official narrative’.

Many people, I am sure must be confused with so many mixed messages and so many story changes.

People who dared to suggest that the Covid-19 virus was engineered in a laboratory in what is now known as ‘extension of function’ research were labelled as ‘conspiracy theorists’. They were accused of spreading misinformation. Yet, following an extensive investigation by the United States Senate Intelligence Committee investigation, there is now accumulating evidence that supports the view that the virus was in fact man-made. Even mainstream media such as CNN are now reporting about this very fact. Here is the view of CNN (July 16, 2022)

‘Senior Biden administration officials overseeing an intelligence review into the origins of the coronavirus now believe the theory that the virus accidentally escaped from a lab in Wuhan, is at least as credible as the possibility that it emerged naturally in the wild – a dramatic shift from a year ago when Democrats publicly downplayed the so-called lab leak theory’.

An official report, An Analysis of the Origin of the COVID-19 Pandemic, by the Senate Committee on Health, Labor and Pensions, found that nearly three years after the COVID-19 pandemic began, ‘substantial evidence demonstrating that the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of a research-related incident has emerged’.

The report concluded, ‘Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident.’ [my emphasis]

No doubt we will eventually hear more on this.

More conflicting information appeared regarding treatment or the lack of treatment for those who succumbed to Covid-19. I reported on a number of doctors who were finding that Covid-19 could be successfully treated. One group of doctors I reported on was the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). They were founded by a group of leading critical care specialists in March 2020, They developed a treatment protocol that enabled patients to survive contracting Covid and if treated early enough would not need to be hospitalised.

However, one of the elements of their treatment protocol involved the use of a drug called Ivermectin. According to the  FLCCCC, Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs known. It is on the World Health Organization’s list of essential medicines, it has been given over 4 billion times around the globe, and won the Nobel Prize for its global and historic impacts in eradicating endemic parasitic infections in many parts of the world. Yet there was such a media blitz decrying its use that most people never had to opportunity to try it.

Aside from the negative publicity, there was little positive information generated in the mainstream media. I reported on Dr Pierre Kory who appeared in the Senate hearing with Senator Johnson pleading for people to use their protocol which included Ivermectin because it worked and it saved lives (I reported on this in a previous article). Dr Tess Lawrie, the Director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in the United Kingdom, was so moved when she heard Dr Kory’s plea that she decided to look into the use of Ivermectin and she was suitably impressed with what she discovered and decided to look at as many studies as she could. She produced a meta-review and sent copies of the review to the UK Parliament.

Pierre Kory was so disturbed by the way this drug was both ignored and attacked, as a drug not fit for treating people at all let alone Covid-19, that he was moved to write about it. He wrote a book about the tragic and needless waste of life that the suppression of Ivermectin had inflicted on the world population. For those who would like to know more about the shenanigans around this sad affair, his book The War on Ivermectin: The Medicine that Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the COVID Pandemic would be a good place to start.

Another drug that was showing great promise was Hydroxychloroquine. Both these drugs were cheap and effective. Hydroxychloroquine was found to be very useful for treating Covid-19 and was promoted by doctors such as Dr Zev Zelenko. However, the use of Hydroxychloroquine was undermined by systemic attacks on its use and anyone who promoted its use. The New England Journal of Medicine published an article on the drug hydroxychloroquine which was a large study boasting the involvement of 169 hospitals and almost 9,000 participants purporting to show it was ineffective for the treatment of Covid. The study was, however, found to be a complete fabrication and had to be retracted. 20 days later the prestigious journal The Lancet, published another study again purporting to represent more than 9,000 participants, this time involving more than 670 hospitals on six continents, yet, again showing the ineffectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in effectively treating Covid-19. These bogus studies were widely reported in the mainstream media and led to the universal condemnation of the use of Hydroxychloroquine. There were other studies undertaken that used underhand methods such as using ridiculously large amounts of the drug that were known to be toxic that were use to undermine its use.

The common denominator of these two drugs is that both were not used in isolation but as part of a protocol with other medications and supplements to obtain optimum benefit. They are both ionophores that combine easily with zinc and which assist in allowing zinc to enter the cells where it can then prevent viral replication. There are a number of ways these items benefit the fight against Covid-19. Aside from helping zinc prevent replication of the virus, one of the main benefits is they attach to the spike protein of the virus which prevents the virus from attaching to the ACE-2 receptors in our cell walls denying entry to the virus in the first place.

Perhaps you can now see why it would be important to have mechanisms such as these available before the cells were already overrun with the virus. Ivermectin also acts as an anti-inflammatory and helps prevent the cytokine storm that can be so damaging to our lungs. There are other virtues of these drugs, another was that they were both extremely cheap and were found to be effective and work synergistically with other elements (when used early enough and with the attendant protocols according to critical care doctors such as the FLCCC).

It is commonly felt that the reason the drugs were attacked was not due to their lack of efficacy but due to the fact that if they were able to be shown to be effective that they would have subverted the roll-out of the experimental products, the vaccines that were given emergency use authorisation on the condition that there were no drugs available to treat Covid currently on the market.

Safe and Effective?

The experimental products that were sold to us as ‘vaccines’ were sold to us as being both safe and effective, yet with the passage of time we found that these vaccines were neither as safe nor effective as they were hyped up to be. We were told that to be protected we would be requiring a further booster and then more boosters to supposedly maintain the levels of antibodies to give effective protection.

Information regarding their efficacy depends on the source of information used. The same can be said for the safety of these novel vaccines. What is significantly different with the whole Covid roll-out, is the sheer volume of the adverse events in the respective government databases. In the USA they use the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). According to VAERS the total number of deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccines is more than double the number of deaths associated with all other vaccines combined since the year 1990. The VAERS Summary report gives a useful graphic image to allow us to realise that something extraordinary is going on here.

Where in previous years a vaccine would be pulled because it was associated with 25 deaths, the authorities who we believe are supposed to be protecting us now seem indifferent to tens of thousands of possible deaths. Whilst association does not mean causation, most authorities believe that the VAERS database significantly understates the true casualty rate. For one thing, who would likely associate a person’s death with taking a vaccine a week, a month or even a few months later following vaccination?  We are certainly in unchartered waters here. It is also becoming increasingly challenging to get hold of reliable sources of information.

Until recently the US maintained one of the best databases for studying the health of the US military and their respective families. Lieutenant Colonel Teresa Long MD, MPH, FS,  who recently testified in the Senate hearing before Senator Johnson was granted whistleblower status so that she could express her concern at what she found was happening to the military personnel in her care. What she found was really disturbing:

‘Insurance companies figure that if there was something catastrophic that happened in the United States, they could see a 10% increase in all-cause morbidity and mortality. 10%, just an unprecedented catastrophic natural event or something that happened in the United States. 40%, no one has even calculated that, that’s never been factored into what things would look like. It’s apocalyptic.
In my 15 years as a doctor taking care of soldiers. I have never seen this litany of debilitating and potentially deadly conditions in soldiers. These conditions included strokes, transient Ischemic attacks, Pericarditis & myocarditis, Erratic Heart Rates, Arrhythmias, Rapid onset cancer, particularly testicular cancer, oesophagal cancer, brain tumours, neuroendocrine tumours, spinal tumours, thyroid dysfunction, Multiple Sclerosis, cognitive impairment, persistent severe insomnia, suppression of the immune system, unprovoked blood clots, Avascular Necrosis, liver dysfunction, menstrual irregularities, and miscarriages.’

Attorney Tom Rens, at the Senator Johnson hearing, revealed some of the data that was causing great concern. I have declarations under penalty of perjury, we intend to submit this to the courts. We have substantial data showing that we saw, for example, that miscarriages increased by almost 300% over the five-year average. We saw an almost 300% increase in cancer over the five-year average. Cancer is not being talked about…We saw-this one is amazing-neurological, So, neurological issues that would affect our pilots, over a 1000% increase, a thousand!

Dr Long complained she was ignored when she tried to bring her concerns to the attention of the very people she felt should be informed: ‘When I reached out to Army Public Health Command and numerous senior medical and operational leaders about my safety concerns. I was ignored. Threats against my career were made, but no appropriate actions were taken to fully investigate the number and scope of adverse medical events after Covid Vaccines.’

She contacted a colleague, Lieutenant Colonel, Dr Pete Chambers, a fellow United States Army Flight Surgeon and asked him to look at the data that she was finding seriously troubling in the military database (DMED). She expressed her fear that she had ‘significant concerns that we won’t have a standing army in five years.’

Chambers, also sought whistle-blower status after what he discovered and when he appeared in the Senate Hearing he stated ‘What I was here today to speak about, truly, was the weaponisation of public health.’

What was truly disconcerting, was that following their testimony, within 24 hours, the DMED database was simply removed and can now no longer be used as an important and useful guide to the health status of the American military.

This is really tragic. What are people supposed to think is going on here?

Another doctor who also gave testimony to the Senate Committee on Health & Human Services was Dr Peter McCullough an internist, cardiologist and professor of medicine at Texas A M University School of Medicine. He is considered the most published person in his field (which deals with the heart and the kidneys) in the world. He was complaining about the complete lack of treatment advice available for those who succumbed to Covid. He describes how he put a team of doctors together to confront this problem: ‘We summarized all we knew about the available drugs and we published our findings in the August 8th issue of The American Journal of Medicine and the title of that paper was “The pathophysiologic basis and rationale for early outpatient treatment.” And, it had a premise there are two bad outcomes to covid-19-hospitalization and death. The second premise, if we don’t do something before the hospitalization we can never stop it, we can never stop it!’

He further reported a stunning piece of information, ‘There were 50 000 papers in the peer-reviewed literature on covid, not a single one told the doctor how to treat it, not a single one! [my emphasis] He also made a short video reviewing his study which went viral and was removed within a week informing him that he had “violated the terms of the community”.   Following this, he was invited to give testimony before the Senate Committee. Here is what happened;

‘Well, one thing led to another and I became the lead witness for the U.S Senate testimony of November 19 2020 and the reason why there was Senate testimony is because there was a near total block on any information of treatment to patients, a near total block. And, so what had happened over time is that we had gotten into a cycle in America of no information on treatment, patients actually think that the virus is untreatable.’

‘I have to tell you what has gone on has been beyond belief. How many of you have turned on a local news station or a national cable news station and ever gotten an update on treatment at home? How many of you have ever gotten a single word about what to do when you get the hand of the diagnosis of covid-19? No wonder it is a complete and total failure at every level. Okay, let’s take the White House. How come we didn’t have a panel of doctors assigned to put all their efforts and stop these hospitalizations? Why don’t we have doctors who actually treated patients get together in a group [my emphasis] and every week give us an update? Why didn’t we have that? Why didn’t we have that at the state level? Why don’t we have any reports about how many patients were treated and spared hospitalizations?  From all the testimonies-I listened to six hours of testimony today-zero!  Zero! We have a complete and total blank spot on treatment it is a blanking phenomenon at least in the United States.’

He discussed at length the shortcomings of the complete lack of discussion and advice from people who were successfully treating patients with Covid on how to treat Covid early to prevent it from escalating to a situation where patients needed hospitalization.

‘When did you ever get an update about how the rest of the world is handling Covid? Never.!What’s happened in this pandemic is the world has closed in on us there’s only one doctor whose face is on TV now. One, not a panel doctors. We always work in groups we always have different opinions. There’s not a single media doctor on TV who’s ever treated a Covid patient, not a single one! There’s not a single person in the White House task force that has ever treated a patient!’

In previous articles I have quoted other doctors who have reported success in treating people with Covid, avoiding their hospitalisation which of course prevented many needless deaths in the process. I have reported Dr McCullough’s testimony to show that people like Dr Pierre Kory, and Dr Marik were not alone in their views. Here are his final comments;

‘So my testimony is to sit here today, is covid-19 has always been a treatable illness. A very large study from McKinney Texas, another one from New York City, show that when doctors treat patients early who are over age 50 with medical problems with a sequenced multi-drug approach with the available drugs, four to six drugs that are available to them... there’s an 85 per cent reduction in hospitalizations and death 85 per cent! 85. I want you to remember that number 85 per cent! We have over 500,000 deaths in the United States. The preventable fraction could have been as high as 85 per cent if our pandemic response would have been laser-focused on the problem, the sick patient right in front of us…we lost focus on the most fundamental. That’s my, that’s my testimony.’

What are we supposed to understand from this whole episode? Whilst the mainstream media has avoided reporting information that we now know could have saved countless lives, we now are learning that the vaccines, far from protecting us as we previously believed, we are now learning that they are far more dangerous than we may have been led to understand. How will history judge this sorry affair I wonder? The mainstream media has been shown to be the lapdog of Pharmaceutical interests as seems are our governments. Few health authorities offered any successful preventative treatments for Covid. What treatments were found to be effective at preventing hospitalisations were attacked and even banned from use. What are we supposed to believe was the reason for all this?

It certainly is not credible to see this as simple ignorance or inept bungling of treating a novel disease. Was this just about the billions of dollars in profits?

There is much more to this sad story. We need to be vigilant and we need to keep our lines of communication open. Good luck.

What do you think?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

No Comments Yet.