Aftermath and Fallout

Posted on 11 min read 328 views


For most people now, the Covid ‘pandemic’ is in the past and people and businesses are doing their best to get back to some kind of normality.

The fallout from the whole experience, however, may be felt for a very long time, not simply due to the deaths attributed to the disease, but due, in part, to the response by the various parties that were delegated to deal with the crisis, particularly the response by the medical establishment, the governments of respective countries, and the response of the mainstream media.

In previous articles, I have reported on the work of several doctors who were successfully treating Covid, with very little—and in some cases—no loss of life. They were advocating the use of cheap repurposed drugs that in combination with items such as intravenous vitamin C and other readily available products were hugely effective. They were ostracised for advocating their treatments that included drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine as I have previously reported, for the simple reason—they now believe—that it would have destroyed the reason for the massive rollout of the new experimental products that they were calling ‘vaccines’.

The emergency use authorisation was only legally supported if there were no readily available drugs to treat the epidemic.

What was one of the most disappointing aspects of the whole affair was the way the mainstream media and the majority of the social media platforms were manipulated and censored to conform to what came to be viewed as the ‘official narrative’.

What is interesting is how, following the passage of time, we now know that where a large number of doctors were criticised, censored, ostracised and accused of delivering ‘dangerous misinformation’, we now have learnt that much of the information they were censored for has turned out to be true after all.

I have already reported on the ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine fake studies that tried (successfully) to prevent their effective use. This led to a large number of doctors reviewing the evidence for themselves and led to them coming out in support for their use. Following the publication of numerous studies that demonstrated the benefits of ivermectin, Dr Pierre Kory was determined that people should know the real truth about ivermectin’s value in treating viral infections, and particularly Covid. It inspired him to write a book about it, The War on Ivermectin—The Medicine That Saved Millions And Could Have Ended The Pandemic.  In this book, he was able to show the large body of evidence that had accumulated that supported its use in the treatment of Covid such that this eventually prompted the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to authorise its use as a bona fide treatment for the disease. However, this was only after the vaccine rollout.

FDA’s Posting on Twitter (now X)

An update on this sorry saga is that following a lawsuit against the FDA by Dr Kory’s associate Dr Paul Marik regarding the FDA’s interference with allowing the use of Ivermectin for the treatment of Covid-19—the FDA prohibited its use and used social media (effectively) to portray Ivermectin as simply a veterinary product, ignoring its successful use for decades treating people for a number of conditions. It labelled the product as a “horse de-wormer”. The FDA agreed to delete online materials and social media posts discouraging the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 in order to settle the lawsuit

Dr Marik said he and his co-plaintiffs sued the FDA because of “their false posts, and their false accusations or false pretences that they made about ivermectin” and because the FDA “exceeded their statutory authority” in doing so. He also commented on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals September 2023 ruling that the FDA exceeded its authority—Marik said the judge in that case, told the FDA that “you are not a physician. You’re not in a position to dictate how physicians practice medicine.” He further commented that the ruling created “very important precedent.”

Dr Paul Marik

Marik added that the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance included ivermectin in its COVID-19 early treatment protocol and its use “resulted in a significantly lower risk of hospitalization and death.” He said its safety and effectiveness are supported by “101 studies [involving] 140,000 patients from 29 countries.”

Safety and effectiveness are brought into question

We now know that the claims made by the pharmaceutical industry about the vaccines being “safe and effective” were simply not true. Doctors who tried to suggest they weren’t safe or effective were severely attacked for daring to question or challenge the evidence that was growing week by week that suggested these experimental products were neither safe nor effective.

More than 1.3 million adverse events were listed on America’s VAERS database between Dec 14, 2020 and July 1st, 2022, which included 29,273 deaths and 241,910 serious injuries. This is more adverse reports than all the adverse reports for all other vaccines in total since the introduction of vaccines. We also know that most authorities believe that deaths and injuries are seriously under-reported on the VAERS database.

People choosing not to get vaccinated attacked

Many people were sceptical about taking the experimental products that were being offered as vaccines against Covid. Information about the actual content of the vaccines was being denied. We were informed that these products were new formulations that were based on gene manipulation creating an mRNA product that would make our cells produce copies of the spike protein that theoretically would make the body produce antibodies against, enabling the body to be better able to defend against attack by the Covid virus.

Many doctors questioned the wisdom of turning the body into a manufacturing plant for the production of the viral spike proteins and manipulating the body’s RNA in such a way. Many doctors were concerned about the long-term consequences, especially as there were no long-term studies to show their safety.

With the passage of time, it became apparent that the virus was a more serious challenge to the older population, people over 70—and especially if they were obese and suffering from other health issues such as diabetes, heart disease or cancer—than younger people. For healthy younger people, especially children covid seemed mostly to have little real effect. We now know from data provided by researchers such as the well-respected epidemiologist Professor John Ioannidis from Stanford that the non-elderly (people younger than 70 years old) represent the vast majority of the population (94% of the global population). We also know from his research that the median infection fatality rate (IFR) for people 19 years and younger was 0.0009%. This is why many doctors—who were not under the direct influence of the pharmaceutical industry and were appraised of this information—were so opposed to the idea of vaccinating children at all. With the risk of actually dying so ridiculously low in this age group why would we take the risk of injecting our children with products with unknown safety profiles? Ioannidis himself brought up this point.

Unparalleled Rise in Deaths

We now know from current data that there has been a substantial rise in the death rate of the general population since the rollout of the vaccinations which is causing immense concern. Part of this concern is because this very significant rise in the death rate is being ignored by both the medical authorities and the governments of the respective populations being affected, which is most of the industrialised nations and more worryingly, the rises in deaths are found particularly in the nations that vaccinated their populations the most. A huge rise in deaths warrants urgent investigation to establish the exact cause of such a dramatic rise in deaths. There are a few studies that have compared the status of the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated which have shown that the vaccinated are the ones that seem to be bearing the brunt of the increase in deaths and also the brunt of the demise of health in the general population. This has to be investigated.

Unfortunately, the information about the excess deaths is not being discussed by the mainstream media, nor by the public health authorities who are supposedly there to advise us all during the pandemic, also, notably, not by the very governments who have the data that we all rely on to enable us to understand the real effects of Covid and the real effects of the vaccines (both in the short-term and the long-term). For this information, shockingly, we have to rely on other sources.

Edward Dowd

Edward Dowd, a brilliant Wall Street careerist who worked for the financial titan Black Rock and became Managing Director in 2004, built a reputation for his keen ability to understand markets, analyse statistics and identify trends early. He says he was alarmed by all the excess deaths among healthy young Americans of working age. His attention to this problem was first drawn to this issue by the CEO of One America insurance company when they publically disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, deaths in people of working age (18-64) were 40% higher than what they were before the pandemic and that the majority of these deaths were not attributed to COVID.

He mentions that a 10% increase in excess deaths would be considered a 1-in-200-year event, but this was 40%! He confirms that a 40% increase in deaths is literally earth-shaking.

Robert F Kennedy Jr, who at this point in time is campaigning for the Presidency, said Dowd made an unforgettable statement regarding the deaths:

“From February 2021 to March 2022, millennials experienced the equivalent of a Vietnam war, with more than 60,000 excess deaths. The Vietnam War took twelve years to kill the same number of healthy young people we’ve just seen die in 12 months.”

This issue provoked Dowd to seriously dig into this subject and led him to publish a detailed study about the unparalleled rise in deaths in his book “Cause Unknown” The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022.

Unprecedented collapse in the Heath

Aside from the earth-shaking rise in the deaths of heathy people who represent the working population we are also experiencing an unprecedented rise of numerous serious health issues that we have previously not experienced before.

In a previous article [ADD LINK] I reported on the discovery made by Lieutenant Colonel Teresa Long MD, MPH, FS, who recently testified in the Senate hearing before Senator Johnson where she expressed her concern at what she found was happening to the military personnel in her care. She revealed an alarming rise in a litany of debilitating and potentially deadly conditions in soldiers that included strokes, transient Ischemic attacks, pericarditis & myocarditis, erratic heart rates, arrhythmias, rapid onset cancers, liver dysfunction, menstrual irregularities, miscarriages and much more. Following giving her testimony to the Senate hearing, and expressing her concerns to her military superiors, one of the responses she reported was the sudden removal of the military database (DMED) which provided most of the data supporting her claims.

I am not sure what is more worrying, the rise in all the health problems or the response that seems to be simply hiding or burying the data that reveals the health problems. Information from New Zealand from Barry Young, one of their leading statisticians, revealed some seriously worrying data.


He had data for the entire country that showed that deaths increased with all the vaccines that were recorded and with the batch identification for each one. It showed a death rate that varied from 4.52% to as much as 21.38% following vaccination. He maintains that the underlying mortality rate in New Zealand should only be 0.75% and that the odds of all these deaths happening by chance is approximately 100 billion to 1.

“So statistically, what we’re saying is that there is no chance that this vaccine is not a killer,” declared Young.

The response of the Government was to arrest Young. He is now seeking whistle-blower status.

Information challenging official spin appearing virtually daily

What is becoming obvious, is, with the passage of time, that it is becoming increasingly difficult to keep a lid on information that is now leaking from a much larger group of sources. Following a Freedom of Information request to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) led by renowned attorney Aaron Siri, a federal judge, released a tranche of 55,000 documents pertaining to Pfizer’s dealings regarding the Covid vaccines that were supposed to be hidden for 75 years. It is only by examining these documents that it becomes fairly obvious that they may not have relished the information these documents contain being released to the general population.

Dr Peter McCullough, the world-renowned cardiologist commented that “Pfizer recorded 1,223 deaths with their product within 90 days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation, watching their family members die after taking the vaccine.” He further suggested we are experiencing an “active cover-up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle.”


Dr Naomi Wolf, CEO of the Daily Clout published a book on the Pfizer documents released, the War Room/Daily Clout Pfizer Documents Analysis Volunteers’ Reports.

In this analysis, she suggests the 46 reports included in the document “appear to be a record of a great crime against humanity.”

She suggests that “Pfizer knew, as it appears, that the mRNA vaccines did not work” and that “the mRNA injections bio-distributed throughout the body in a couple of days, accumulating in the liver, adrenals, spleen—and ovaries.” She informs us that “Pfizer and the FDA knew that the injections damaged the hearts of minors—and yet waited months to inform the public.” She suggests that the reports reveal how 61 people died of stroke, and five people died from liver damage shortly after the injection. In reference to the documents she says, “You will see neurological events, cardiac events, strokes, brain hemorrhages, and blood clots, lung clots and leg clots at massive scale.”

“Most seriously of all, you will see a 360-degree attack on human reproductive capability: with harms to sperm counts, testes, sperm motility; harms to ovaries, menstrual cycles, placentas; you will see that over 80 per cent of the pregnancies in one section of the Pfizer documents ended in spontaneous abortion or miscarriage.”

In a sign that perhaps the mainstream media might actually start to participate in real journalism regarding the Covid fiasco, the Telegraph, a leading UK newspaper, reported that Pfizer has been accused by the UK’s pharmaceutical watchdog of “bringing discredit” on the industry after senior Pfizer executives had used social media to promote “unlicensed” medicine and vaccine. The company had been found to have made misleading claims and to have breached the regulatory code five times. This was following a previous occasion where Pfizer’s CEO Dr Albert Bourla, has been rapped by the UK’s pharmaceutical watchdog for making “misleading” statements about children’s vaccines.


He used an interview with the BBC in December 2021 to claim that “there is no doubt in my mind that the benefits, completely, are in favour of” vaccinating youngsters aged five to 11 against Covid-19. The breaches of the code relating to misleading the public, making unsubstantiated claims and the lack of balance were subsequently upheld.

There is no doubt that further information regarding the debacle around the Covid pandemic will present itself. It seems like virtually every day there are yet newer revelations leaking out of the previously highly censored subject of the Covid story. I feel it’s an unstoppable force, as more and more people seek to understand the truth about this debacle and the collapse of health that lies in its wake.

What do you think?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

No Comments Yet.